Monthly Archives: October 2012

Andrea Mitchell

Why is it that MSNBC will allow Andrea Mitchell,  one of their “journalists”,   to continuously accost Governor Romney while she lauds everything Obama does?

Andrea Mitchell is a shill for Obama and the Democrats, cloaked in the mantle of a tv network.

Shame on Andrea Mitchel.  Shame on MSNBC!  Shame on anyone who believes the garbage that MSNBC broadcasts!

Romney, the “doer” vs. Obama, the “talker”…..

Which candidate for President can MAKE things better………….and which candidate will TALK about how he wants to make things better?  Sandy, the hurricane running rampant throughout our Eastern seaboard, provides a real time example of how each candidate reacts in an emergency.

Obama is sitting tight in Washington, D.C., ostensibly to monitor rescue efforts.  The President wants to appear to be Presidential while, of course, he is just protecting himself and his image.  We know the image of Obama at the head of rescue efforts is false for many reasons.  First is Obama’s own spokesman, Carney, saying that the President returned because:  Due to deteriorating weather conditions in the Washington, DC area, the President will not attend today’s campaign event in Orlando, Florida.  The President will return to the White House to monitor the preparations for and early response to Hurricane Sandy.  (

Returning due to weather is obviously true.  However, the President didn’t monitor Benghazi, Libya, in real time.  4 Americans died there, due to his dereliction of duty.  So, why should we believe that Obama cares now when he didn’t then?  Besides, rescue details are handled by the Governors of the affected states, not the President.  All the President does is release Federal funds.  Essentially, the President sits on his hands and opens “our” wallet.  And, oh yes, THIS President does a lot of talking about how he “wants” to help.

Then, there is Governor Romney who is also curtailing his campaigning.  However,  Governor Romney is actively engaged in rescue efforts.  Romney is sending his campaign bus with supplies into the areas affected by the storm.

Leadership: Romney Uses Campaign Bus to Deliver Hurricane Relief


So, do you want a “doer” like Governor Romney or a “talker” like President Obama for the next four years?

Consider the high unemployment, the national deficit rising every second, businesses pessimistic about the future, our enemies salivating at the possibility of overwhelming America, and our allies (remember Israel?) wondering whom to trust, BEFORE you decide.  Whom do we need?

We need Governor Romney, a successful businessman, who knows how to put our country back together again.

We need the “doer” –Governor Romney — to “do” for America what he did for Massachusetts and for the Olympics.

MSNBC……Out of the Closet!

MSNBC is “Out of the Closet”………..  Out, that is, for Lieberal causes!

MSNBC must have thought that the right to free speech means they are “free” to pretend to be a news outlet and then, promote lieberal causes.  Was that “closet”  too small for their ginormous egos?   After all, they are so much smarter and tolerant than the rest of us.  We NEED someone to tell us how to vote.  With the assumption of superiority,  MSNBC is coming right out and telling viewers how to vote.  The only surprise is that they have waited so long.

Romney wins……..AGAIN!

The third Presidential debate for 2012 was yet another example of Governor Romney’s ability to ASSESS SITUATIONS and determine THE optimum strategy.  No matter the provocation, Governor Romney never sank to President Obama’s level of scurrilous lies, insults, and innuendoes.

While President Obama blustered and insulted Governor Romney, Romney replied with grace and knowledge.

While President Obama tried to defend his abysmal record, Romney pointed out inconsistencies and policies detrimental to Americans.

While President Obama lied about Romney and denigrated Romney’s sterling (ask former President Clinton if it’s sterling) reputation, Romney replied without rancour….and, with provable facts.

Obama’s demeanor, words, and attitude were wrong for him, America, and the world.

And, even worse for Obama, his “facts”, as he likes to call them, were also wrong.

One example was Obama’s condescending remark about “bayonets and horses” which is demonstrably false.  Our Marines DO still use bayonets.  And, we DID use horses in Afghanistan!

While the pundits, most of whom are lieberals, might call this a tie — at best — anyone else checking the facts, watching Romney’s statesmanlike demeanor, or seeing Obama’s inability to defend his record will call this a definitive win for Romney.   AGAIN!



Romney wins, Michelle applauds

So, if you read this title, it appears that Michelle Obama was applauding that Romney won the second debate, too!

If so, you would be 50% correct.

Romney did win.  Michelle did applaud.

But, Michelle applauded when Candy  Crowley  inserted herself into the debate with a demonstrably false comment which supported the President.

Michelle Obama Broke Agreed Upon Rules, Clapped At Debate

And, even though Candy did her level best to lie FOR the President, she had to recant her statement before the night was out:

Moderator: Romney was ‘right in the main’ on Benghazi, but ‘picked the wrong word’

Whatever word Romney chose, it was NOT Candy’s responsibility to correct him.

Of course, she was desperate to help the President by interrupting Governor Romney 28 times, by one count, and giving the President 9% more time than Governor Romney. In the three debates, the purportedly unbiased moderators gave the President 44 minutes to Romney’s 40 minutes.

Even so, Governor Romney was a clear winner with his precise and informative answers and with his counter arguments to pretty much everything the President threw at him, including the tired, old, political slurs that the Democrats hope will muddy up Governor Romney’s image.

According to the polls, the hackneyed smear campaigns by the Democrats are not stopping people from seeing and liking Governor Romney.

Applause, please. Michelle, that’s your cue!

Candy Crowley, Lieberal Moderator!

Candy Crowley, of CNN, is the moderator for the second Presidential debate tomorrow night.  A moderator is:




a person or thing that moderates. 2.a person who presides over a panel discussion on radio or television.
BOTH CAMPAIGNS agreed to having a moderator.  BUT, the moderator is NOT supposed to interject herself/himself into the discussion.  The TOWNHALL AUDIENCE is supposed to be the center for questions to the candidates.
Ah, well.  Candy is obviously a Lieberal and, as such, SHE DOESN’T HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES!

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012
MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images

MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images
CNN anchor Candy Crowley arrives at the White House for a state dinner in honor of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and his wife Kim Yoon-ok in Washington on Oct. 13, 2011

11:10 p.m. E.T.

In a rare example of political unity, both the Romney and Obama campaigns have expressed concern to the Commission on Presidential Debates about how the moderator of this Tuesday’s town hall has publicly described her role, TIME has learned.

While an early-October memorandum of understanding between the Obama and Romney campaigns suggests that CNN’s Candy Crowley would play a limited role in the Tuesday-night session, Crowley, who is not a party to that agreement, has done a series of interviews on her network in which she has suggested that she will assume a broader set of responsibilities. As Crowley put it last week, “Once the table is kind of set by the town-hall questioner, there is then time for me to say, ‘Hey, wait a second, what about X, Y, Z?’”

Since when does a journalist have the authority to unilaterally change the rules?  When did Candy Crowley become the Supreme Moderator, in charge of determining what the rules actually mean?  Are we back to Clinton’s “depends upon the meaning of ‘is’ ” ?????????

If you watched the VP debate, you witnessed another Lieberal, Joe Biden, who decided HE didn’t have to follow the rules either!  He hectored, interrupted CongressmanPaul Ryan’s answers (82 times), and was consistently in Ryan’s face.   He didn’t even follow the precept of telling the Truth!   The “facts” offered by Joe Biden turned out to be lies.  He didn’t graduate from Law School in the upper ranks.  He DID vote for the war resolutions.  He DID know about security concerns at Benghazi.

Even Martha Raddatz believed herself to be above the rules — she interrupted Paul Ryan 35 times, according to one “counter”.

It’s a mystery why Lieberals believe they can rewrite the rules to suit their perception of reality.  But, then,   President Obama  has rewritten his own personal history to make it more to his liking!  So, what can you expect from Lieberals?  Unfortunately, it’s more of the same — until their perception becomes reality through sheer repetition and voter fatigue.

Candy Crowley plans to organize the next Presidential debate to HER liking.  Candy  is definitely a Lieberal.


Remember Obama’s famous 2008 quote?

If you don’t have any big issues, you attack your opponent!


And, that is exactly what the Libs are doing.  After all, they can’t praise any of Obama’s record.  Everything to do with Obama’s term of President is dismal:  the economy, the high unemployment, the mess in Benghazi, the Senate who can’t pass a budget, failing green companies that he supported, and on and on, ad nauseum.  So, the media is trying to deal with small issues and unwarranted attacks against Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan.   And, in the process, the liberal media is exposing their aversion to the truth:

Even among true “blue” Libs, it would be difficult to find a majority to agree with this zany Zak character’s opinion of the VP debate and of Ryan, specifically.

And, to credit VP Biden as any sort of elder statesman is just plain crazy.  Biden was a plagarist.  He lied about his Law School career.  He lied about when Obama knew about the terrorist attack in Benghazi.  He doesn’t understand the U.S. economy.  He is just a grin with a body behind it.  (Thank you, Clint).

Remember Obama’s famous 2008 quote?

Then, remember why Obama’s ads are always criticizing Romney and NEVER proposing anything of his own.

Biden, the Class Clown for the Democrats

Other than smirking, giggling up his sleeve, gesticulating in a wild fashion, interrupting both Congressman Ryan and the moderator (who also interrupted Ryan), and, generally, acting like the class clown, what did Biden do in the VP debate?


Well, he lied.  What a surprise.


Print Article Send a Tip

by Joel B. Pollak 12 Oct 2012, 5:28 AM PDT post a comment

Once again, Joe Biden lied his way through a Vice Presidential debate–just as he did in his contest with Sarah Palin in 2008. This time, the media caught a few of Biden’s worst “malarkey” moments–as did his opponent, Paul Ryan, when he could get a word in edgewise.

Here are the top ten worst lies told by Biden during the debate:

10. “With all due respect, that’s a bunch of malarkey….not a single thing he said is accurate.” At the outset of the debate, Biden tried to paint Ryan as a liar–when Biden, in fact, was the one lying. Ryan had pointed out: 1) that the White House had distanced itself from the Cairo embassy’s apologies on 9/11; 2) that Obama had failed to speak up for Iranian protestors in 2009; 3) that the Obama administration called Syria’s dictator a “reformer”; 4) and that the Obama administration is imposing defense cuts and projecting weakness. All of that is true.

9. “The president has met with Bibi [Netanyahu] a dozen times….This is a bunch of stuff.” While they have met several times–not a dozen–that includes a meeting at which Obama made the Israeli prime minister enter the White House through a back entrance, refused to take a picture with him, and left him on his own for dinner. Specifically, Ryan had criticized Obama’s refusal to meet Netanyahu in New York last month, and to tape talk show interviews instead–a clear snub that sent the wrong signal, again, to Israel’s enemies.

8. “Just let the taxes expire like they’re supposed to on those millionaires.” Biden’s “millionaires” are actually households earning more than $250,000 a year, which includes many middle-class families with two earners, and small business owners in particular who report business earnings as personal income. Biden and Obama have repeatedly labeled those earning over $250,000 as “millionaires and billionaires,” distorting the actual impact of their tax plan on the non-millionaires it would hit hardest, who create a vast proportion of small business jobs.

7. “You know, I heard that death panel argument from Sarah Palin. It seems that every vice presidential debate, I hear this kind of stuff about panels.” Biden’s cheap shot against Palin was an attempt to diminish both her and the man sitting across from him. But Palin never talked about “death panels” in her debate with Biden, for the simple reason that Obamacare had not yet been proposed. Nor did Ryan mention “death panels”–he had addressed the undeniable fact that Obamacare proposes a board to impose cost controls.

6. “The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for.” Biden’s lie about Ryan’s budget was an attempt to dodge responsibility for lax embassy security–and to cover up that the Obama called for new cuts to embassy security just days after the 9/11 attacks. Ryan’s proposal, which called for a 19% overall decrease in non-defense discretionary spending, does not even mention embassy security–the Obama campaign merely made up that number by applying 19% across the board.

5. “No, they are not four years closer to a nuclear weapon.” Biden’s attempt to lie about the glaring reality of the Iranian nuclear program fell flat. Iran is indeed four years closer to a nuclear weapon, and the Obama administration–believing it knew better than its predecessors–tried to reinvent the wheel on talks with Iran, causing frustration to our allies in Europe and the Middle East. Meeting after meeting this year has failed to produce results, and the loophole-filled sanctions, while hurting Iran somewhat, are not stopping its nuclear program.

4. “No religious institution, Catholic or otherwise…has to be a vehicle to get contraception in any insurance policy they provide. That is a fact.” No, it is not a fact–it is the opposite of a fact, and saying “that is a fact” does not make it any less a blatant lie. The Obama administration is forcing religious institutions to provide contraceptive and abortion drugs through their insurance policies. That is the reason several dozen religious institutions are suing the administration to defend their First Amendment freedom of religion.

3. “It came from this man voting to put two wars on a credit card…I was there. I voted against him.” Biden voted for both the Iraq war and the Afghanistan war. He did not vote for George W. Bush’s plan to extend coverage of Medicare to prescription drugs (though he voted for an earlier, similar proposal), nor did he vote for the Bush tax cuts. But he voted for both of the wars he derided last night. To quote Bill Clinton’s speech to the Democratic National Convention: “It takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did.”

2. “What we did is we saved $716 billion and put it back — applied it to Medicare.” Biden repeated the lie the Obama administration has been telling since before Obamacare passed in 2010: that cuts to Medicare today were savings that extend the life of the program. They would be–if the same $716 billion wasn’t also being used to pay for Obamacare. As Ryan pointed out in 2010, and again last night, you can’t double-count the same cuts. Taking $716 billion out of Medicare means exactly that–and hurts, not helps, the program’s solvency.

1. “Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security again.” Biden lied through his teeth about the fact that the administration–specifically, the State Department–had been told again and again that security on the ground in Libya, and in Benghazi in particular, was inadequate. The day before, in Congressional hearings on the Libya attacks, former regional security director Eric Nordstrom described his frustration with having those requests turned down by the government bureaucracy: “For me the Taliban is on the inside of the building.


Martha Raddatz — the Liberal media’s “hit” man

ABC is struggling to find a moderator for the VP debate because ALL their staffers are Obama supporters.

Their final choice is  Martha Raddatz,  a fervant Obama supporter, who has infinite connections to Obama and a vested interest in his re-election.  Here are a few of Martha’s links to Obama:

1- President Obama attended Martha Raddatz’ wedding.

2-Obama appointed her husband, Julius Genachowski, to head the  Federal Trade Commission.

3- Martha’s husband was a classmate of Obama’s at Harvard.

4- Obama and Genachowski were members of the Harvard Law Review.

These are only a few of the connections between the media and the Democrats’ party network.  This is why the media slants their coverage of the Presidential election consistently to enhance the Democrats’ reputation.  This is why the media’s approval rating is lower than a snake’s belly.

It’s sad that Martha is the “best” that the media can offer to moderate the VP debate.  But, based on the coverage of this election, it is no surprise that none of the networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, could find an impartial person to moderate the debate.  And, scary that Martha’s connections to Obama were hidden!

Oh, yes.  Martha Raddatz was NOT chosen for her integrity.  She was chosen to be the Liberal media’s “hit” man.


Why does the stock market dictate a vote for Romney?

Does the stock market’s “high” really help you decide whom to vote for?  Well, it should!

With record levels of unemployment, gas prices surging, home prices dropping, more people on food stamps,  the stock market seems to be  a sign of hope.  But,  it isn’t!

The reason for the stock market’s high prices is that it is the only place to invest with any hope of earning a decent return.  And, there are many investors who are stashing their cash in the stock market which means there is very high demand for a limited product.  And, generally,  high demand means higher prices.

So, why are so many people and institutions investing in the stock market?

It is the uncertainly created by the current administration’s policies.  Companies are holding their capital close to the vest because they don’t know what the future will bring in the way of expensive regulations, increased taxes, and government bungling of the economy and foreign policy. Individuals are NOT spending because they are worried about future taxes or the possibility of losing their jobs because the promised “summer of recovery” has NOT happened.

So, why vote for Governor Romney and Representative Ryan?

Governor Romney has been a successful businessman for many, many years.  He understands how to make businesses successful by lowering taxes and reducing regulations. He understands how to get our country working again.   Representative Ryan, too, understands financial matters, having been chairman of the House budget committee.

The stock market cannot tell us what to do, but,  it is a warning sign to us that we need to fix the economy so all areas can flourish.  The high prices on the DOW may make investors happy, but it should make us wary…..wary of an administration that has demolished all other areas of our market place.

We need the economy to thrive in all areas…..and, for that, we need Romney and Ryan!